JURY & ASSESSMENT

Give every idea a considered review.

Hyparmuse invites jurors across design disciplines to bring diverse perspectives and independent judgement to the work.

Anne Asensio
Invited jury · France / Paris

Anne Asensio

Vice President, Design Experience · Dassault Systèmes

Design Strategy & Experience

Anne Asensio is Vice President of Design Experience at Dassault Systèmes. Her international leadership experience spans Renault, General Motors and Dassault Systèmes, where she connects design research, technological innovation and corporate strategy while contributing to design education and professional organisations.

Jonas Lind
Invited jury · Denmark / Copenhagen

Jonas Lind

Design Director · Lind / Works

Industrial Design

Jonas Lind is Design Director at Lind / Works, working across industrial design, research and professional review. Their practice focuses on circular product systems and on making design decisions accountable to real use, technical conditions and long-term public value.

Dae Kim
Invited jury · South Korea / Seoul

Dae Kim

Professor · Hongik University

Digital Experience

Dae Kim is Professor at Hongik University, working across digital experience, research and professional review. Their practice focuses on inclusive services and interaction and on making design decisions accountable to real use, technical conditions and long-term public value.

Sofia Almeida
Invited jury · Portugal / Lisbon

Sofia Almeida

Creative Director · Atelier Almeida

Interior Architecture

Sofia Almeida is Creative Director at Atelier Almeida, working across interior architecture, research and professional review. Their practice focuses on adaptive reuse and material culture and on making design decisions accountable to real use, technical conditions and long-term public value.

Noah Williams
Invited jury · Canada / Toronto

Noah Williams

Design Researcher · Northline Lab

Interaction Design

Noah Williams is Design Researcher at Northline Lab, working across interaction design, research and professional review. Their practice focuses on human-computer interaction and trust and on making design decisions accountable to real use, technical conditions and long-term public value.

Assessment and publication

Material checks, blind review, decisions and publication are handled separately. Jury members declare conflicts, and entrant account details are hidden from the review workspace.